Información sobre riesgo, prevención, detección, síntomas, diagnosis, tratamiento y apoyo para el cáncer.
Información sobre el tratamiento del cáncer incluyendo quirúrgica, quimioterapia, radioterapia, estudios clínicos, terapia con protón, medicina complementaria avanzadas.
OncoLink se complace en ofrecer una amplia lista de lista completa de los agentes quimioterapéuticos más comúnmente usados??. Esta guía de referencia incluye información sobre la forma en que cada fármaco se administra, cómo funcionan, y los pacientes los efectos secundarios comunes pueden experimentar.
Maneras que los pacientes de cáncer y las personas que le cuidan puedan enfrentar el cáncer, los efectos secundarios, nutrición, cuestiones en general sobre el apoyo para el cáncer, duelo/decisiones sobre el termino de vida, y experiencias compartidas por sobrevivientes.
Tipos de Cancer / Cánceres Gastrointestinal / Cáncer Gástrico / Recursos de NCI
National Cancer Institute®
Ultima Vez Modificado: 1 de junio del 2002
1
UI - 12002081
AU - Ibingira CB
TI -
Management of cancer of the stomach in Mulago Hospital Kampala, Uganda.
SO - East Afr Med J 2001 May;78(5):233-7
AD - Department of Anatomy, Makerere Medical School, Kampala, Uganda.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical presentation, mode of investigation
and management of gastric cancer at New Mulago Hospital. DESIGN:
Prospective descriptive study. SETTINGS: Three general surgical wards,
Department of Surgery, New Mulago Hospital. SUBJECTS: Thirty five
patients were studied within 12 months. RESULTS: Gastric cancer was
found to be prevalent in tribes inhabiting volcanic areas of south
western Uganda especially the Banyankole (25%). The commonest mode of
clinical presentation was epigastric pain, weight loss, constipation,
epigastric tenderness, palpable epigastric mass and anaemia. The most
accurate mode of investigation was by endoscopy followed by barium meal.
The commonest locality was the pyloric atrium (40%) histologically
adenocarcinoma (95.5%) predominated. Gastric cancer was found to be more
common in patients with blood group O+ve. All patients had been
subjected to some kind of medical treatment especially with antiacids,
H2 receptor antagonists which contributed to the delay in presentation.
The majority of patients (94.5%) presented with advanced disease and no
curative surgery was possible. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that
early diagnosis of gastric cancer is still a dream at Mulago hospital
since most patients present with advanced disease. To address this
problem, all health workers should be sensitised on symptoms and signs
for early aggressive investigation or an early referral to enable early
diagnosis of gastric cancer. The investigatory capacity of rural
hospitals should be boosted to enable early detection of gastric cancer.
2
UI - 11923126
AU - Roukos DH
TI -
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer: wave goodbye to extensive
surgery?
SO - Ann Surg Oncol 2002 Apr;9(3):220-1
3
UI - 11923135
AU - Hundahl SA; Macdonald JS; Benedetti J; Fitzsimmons T; Southwest Oncology
TI -
Group and the Gastric Intergroup
Surgical treatment variation in a prospective, randomized trial of
chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer: the effect of undertreatment.
SO - Ann Surg Oncol 2002 Apr;9(3):278-86
AD - Queen's Cancer Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, USA.
shundahl@queens.org
BACKGROUND: Intergroup 0116 (Southwest Oncology Group 9008), a national,
multicenter, two-armed, prospective, randomized trial of adjuvant
postoperative chemoradiotherapy, has demonstrated significant benefit.
METHODS: We prospectively captured complete surgical information,
including the treatment of various lymph node stations, for 553 of the
556 eligible participants in this trial. Before any survival analysis,
we coded D level by using the Japanese general rules and used the
Maruyama program to estimate the likelihood of disease in undissected
regional node stations, defining the sum of these estimates as the
Maruyama Index of Unresected Disease (MI). We analyzed survival with Cox
multivariate regression. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of participating
patients underwent D0 lymphadenectomy. The median MI was 70 (range,
0-429). In contrast to D level, MI proved to be an independent
prognostic factor, even with adjustment for the potentially linked
variables of T stage and number of positive nodes. We detected no
significant interaction between surgical or pathologic variables and the
favorable effect of adjuvant treatment, but the power to detect such
interaction was generally low. CONCLUSIONS: MI, a measure of unresected
regional nodal disease in gastric cancer, proved an independent
predictor of survival. Surgical undertreatment, as observed in this
trial, clearly undermined survival.
4
UI - 12013286
AU - Kasakura Y; Ajani JA; Fujii M; Mochizuki F; Takayama T
TI -
Management of perforated gastric carcinoma: a report of 16 cases and
review of world literature.
SO - Am Surg 2002 May;68(5):434-40
AD - Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The University of Texas M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Perforated gastric carcinoma is rare; however, it is a serious condition
associated with complications. To understand the proper management of
this disease and to characterize its clinical course we reviewed
available data on 16 patients with perforated gastric carcinoma. We
collected data on the age and sex of the patients as well as operative
findings and histological features of the primary tumor. The depth of
invasion and presence of lymph node metastasis were also recorded. The
Union Internationale Contre Cancer stage, extent of resection, and
surgical method used were reviewed. We also reviewed published
information on the management of perforated gastric carcinoma. The
carcinoma was stage I in three cases, stage II in one case, stage III in
three cases, and stage IV in nine cases. Many patients had distant
metastases. Fourteen patients underwent gastrectomy. Two patients whose
preoperative condition was poor died of surgery-related complications,
but patients with early-stage carcinoma underwent an R0 resection
(resection of the primary tumor with negative margins) and had minimal
complications. We conclude that the outcome of patients who were able to
undergo radical surgery was good and correlated with the stage of
cancer. It is important to perform gastrectomy rather than repair the
perforation first, and a proper lymphadenectomy should follow--thus a
two-step surgery when necessary.
5
UI - 12025834
AU - Martin RC 2nd; Jaques DP; Brennan MF; Karpeh M
TI -
Achieving RO resection for locally advanced gastric cancer: is it worth
the risk of multiorgan resection?
SO - J Am Coll Surg 2002 May;194(5):568-77
AD - Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
BACKGROUND: In gastric adenocarcinoma, only complete resection (R0)
translates into survival benefit. Given the potential for increased
morbidity and mortality from multiple organ resection we asked the
question as to whether extended (multiple organ) resection was justified
1,283 patients underwent gastric resection for adenocarcinoma at
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and were entered and followed in
a prospectively recorded database. Four hundred eighteen patients (33%)
underwent primary resection and had one or more organs resected in
addition to the stomach. Eight hundred twenty-six patients (64%)
underwent gastrectomy alone, with 39 patients (3%) not undergoing
gastrectomy. Clinicopathologic, operative, and morbidity data were
evaluated in this group. Complications were categorized by severity on a
scale from 0 to 5, 0 being no complication to 5 being death. Chi-square
analysis and the logistic regression method were used to compare and
estimate factors significantly associated with having a complication.
RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-seven patients had a single additional
organ resected, 63 had two organs, and 18 had three organs. Five hundred
eighty complications occurred in 33% of patients (404 of 1,283). The
perioperative mortality was 4% (48 patients). Logistic regression
identified the number of organs resected, two or greater, to be
predictive of complications (RR 2.0), as well as age greater than 70
years old (RR 1.57). When excluding minor complications (values 1 and
2), only the number of organs resected (RR 3.8) was a major factor for
severe complications (values 3, 4, and 5). CONCLUSIONS: Resection of two
or more adjacent organs in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma is associated
with a greater risk of developing a complication. The use of a graded
surgical complication scale is needed for better reporting and
comparison of complications. Achieving an R0 resection should still be
considered the goal, even in locally advanced gastric cancer, but
resection of additional organs should be performed judiciously.
6
UI - 11676261
AU - Klimenkov AA; Nered SN; Gubina GI
TI -
[Basic directions in studying cancer of the resected stomach]
SO - Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk 2001;(9):71-4
The causes, incidence of, and the time of occurrence of cancer of the
stomach resected for benign diseases are analyzed. The outcomes of 384
operations for recurrent gastric cancer, including 174 radical ones, are
presented. The highest resectability was noted in late recurrence and
following Bilroth-II gastrectomy with long-loop forward colonic
anastomosis. The late outcomes depend on the time of recurrence, its
location in the remaining part of the stomach, and the presence of
lymphogenic metastases. Experience of 16 extirpations of esophagojejunal
anastomosis was used to show whether recurrent gastric cancer after
gastrectomy with satisfactory immediate and long-term outcomes can be
surgically treated. The fate of 292 patients with gastric cancer in whom
tumor cells were detected along the line of resection is traced.
Preventive resurgery in this group of patients is not unjustifiable as
in 80.8% of them recurrence fails to occur at all or is followed by late
metastases.
7
UI - 11902492
AU - Lin YC; Chen JS; Wang CH; Wang HM; Chang HK; Liaul CT; Yang TS; Liaw CC;
TI -
Liu HE
Weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV) and bimonthly
cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
SO - Jpn J Clin Oncol 2001 Dec;31(12):605-9
AD - Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei,
Taiwan. yclinof@adm.cgmh.org.tw
BACKGROUND: A phase II clinical trial was performed to evaluate the
activity and toxicity of bimonthly cisplatin and weekly 24-h infusion of
high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced
23 chemo-naive patients of advanced gastric cancer were enrolled in this
study. The regimen consisted of weekly 24-h infusion of 5-FU (2,600
mg/m2) and LV 150 mg and bimonthly cisplatin (25-50 mg/m2) bolus for 12
weeks followed by a 2-week break. RESULTS: There were 10 male and 13
female patients with a median age of 52 years. A total of 428
chemotherapy treatments were given with a mean of 11. Seventeen patients
were evaluable for response. There were 41% (7/17) partial response, 18%
(3/17) stable disease and 41% (7/17) progressive disease. The grade III
or IV toxicity included anorexia 35% (8/23), fatigue 26% (6/23),
vomiting 17% (4/23) and mucositis 9% (2/23). One patient developed
perforated duodenal stump after chemotherapy. One patient died of
hyperammonemia-related coma. The median times to disease progression and
overall survival were 3.5 and 7 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This
regimen showed modest activity against gastric cancer. However, there
was no survival advantage and there was greater toxicity than with
weekly high-dose 5-FU-LV alone.
8
UI - 11723480
AU - Leme PL; Rodrigues FC; Malheiros CA
TI -
[Duodenal-pyloric-antrum obstruction and metabolic disturbances: is
important an adequate preoperative care?]
SO - Rev Assoc Med Bras 2001 Jul-Sep;47(3):177-8
9
UI - 11819868
AU - Xu CT; Huang LT; Pan BR
TI -
Current gene therapy for stomach carcinoma.
SO - World J Gastroenterol 2001 Dec;7(6):752-9
AD - Editorial Department, the Journal of Fourth Military Medical University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China. xuct2000@263.net
10
UI - 11859986
AU - Pentheroudakis G; Lim KC; Dunlop DJ; Soukop M; Eatock MM
TI -
Non-infusional 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cisplatin in the
treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastro-oesophageal
adenocarcinoma.
SO - Acta Oncol 2001;40(7):855-61
AD - Department of Medical Oncology, St Mungo Institute, Glasgow Royal
Infirmary, Scotland. penther@ukonline.co.uk
To reduce the Hickman line-associated morbidity of continuous infusion
5-fluorouracil combined with epirubicin and cisplatin (ECF) and to
investigate the need for infusional regimens, we conducted a
retrospective study in patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal
adenocarcinoma. Thirty-six patients, with histologically proven
irresectable gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma were given: 60 mg/m2
cisplatin on day 1, 35 mg/m2 doxorubicin on day 1 and 500 mg/m2
5-fluorouracil on days 1 and 8 (NIACF) every 3-weeks. A median of 3
cycles was administered. The principal toxicity was myelosuppression
with grade III/IV neutropenia in 47% of cycles. Neutropenic fever
occurred in 5% of the cycles: non-haematological toxicity was mild and
there were no treatment-related deaths. Administered dose intensity was
96.1% for doxorubicin, 93.6% for cisplatin and 90.5% for 5-fluorouracil.
There were 16 partial responses and 1 complete response (overall
response rate 47%, 95% confidence interval CI 31-63%); 8 patients had
stable disease. Median progression-free and overall survival rates were
5 months (95% CI 4-6) and 8 months (95% CI 6-10), respectively. NIACF is
a well-tolerated regimen in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma
that precludes the need for central venous access, with activity similar
to that observed with ECF.
11
UI - 11989244
AU - Maehara Y; Kakechi Y; Sumiyoshi Y; Kimura K; Takesue F; Oiwa H; Baba H;
TI -
Adachi Y; Tsujiya S; Haraguchi M; Korenaga T; Okamura T; Tamada R;
Ichikichi Y
[Departmental review of surgical cases in the last 17 years: Stomach
cancers]
SO - Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 2002 Mar;93(3 Suppl):9-11
12
UI - 11979416
AU - Gunderson LL
TI -
Gastric cancer--patterns of relapse after surgical resection.
SO - Semin Radiat Oncol 2002 Apr;12(2):150-61
AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Medical School and Mayo
Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
A knowledge of patterns of relapse after initial treatment with surgery
alone is essential to determining the relative importance of both local
(irradiation) and systemic adjuvants (chemotherapy, other) to surgery. A
presentation of anatomic factors and pathways of tumor spread provides a
basis for understanding the subsequent patterns of relapse data found in
clinical, autopsy, and reoperative series. Implications for adjuvant
therapy are summarized. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All
rights reserved.
13
UI - 11979417
AU - Kim HJ; Karpeh MS
TI -
Surgical approaches and outcomes in the treatment of gastric cancer.
SO - Semin Radiat Oncol 2002 Apr;12(2):162-9
AD - Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC,
USA.
Resection with extended lymphadenectomy in obtaining local-regional
control with negative margins remains the only potentially curative
modality in the treatment of gastric cancer. Complete (R0) resections,
along with depth of invasion and adequate nodal staging, remain the most
important prognostic factors. Because current chemotherapy regimens have
limited benefit in advanced disease, the effectiveness of local-regional
modalities takes on greater significance. The extent of surgical
resection varies with the size, depth, location of the primary tumor,
and the stage of disease. Studying patterns of recurrent disease and
elucidating the impact of positive margins have led to insights into the
biology of the disease and the limitations of local-regional therapies.
Considerable controversy surrounds the notion of what defines an
adequate lymph node dissection (LND). The recommendation of routine
extended (D2) lymphadenectomy (ELND) is difficult to justify based on
available randomized studies, but ELND may benefit selected patients
when performed by surgeons who can accomplish the dissection with
acceptable morbidity/mortality rates. An extended LND results in
improved staging, allowing standardization of prognostic factors and
survival data worldwide. Patient selection remains critical, limiting
the role of surgery in advanced disease and reserving aggressive
surgical resection for patients with high curative potential. Copyright
2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
14
UI - 11979418
AU - Willett CG
TI -
Results of radiation therapy in gastric cancer.
SO - Semin Radiat Oncol 2002 Apr;12(2):170-5
AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital,
Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Radiation therapy has been used in the treatment of patients with
gastric cancer in two clinical settings: definitive therapy for locally
advanced, unresectable tumors and adjuvant therapy following surgery for
high-risk disease. For patients with locally advanced, unresectable or
subtotally resected gastric carcinoma, radiotherapeutic approaches with
and without chemotherapy have been employed, because these tumors appear
localized, without clinically detectable metastases. Combined treatment
with radiation therapy and chemotherapy appears to prolong survival but
rarely results in long-term cure. Although only a modest effect was seen
on survival, importantly, these studies established the foundation of
contemporary combined-modality therapy and have served to stimulate
further clinical investigation in gastric cancer as well as other
gastrointestinal disease sites. For patients undergoing resection and
lymphadenectomy with curative intent, the development of local or
regional failure is common, occurring in 40% to 65% of patients. Sites
of local and regional failure following resection include the
gastric/tumor bed in 20% to 55%, the anastomosis in 25% to 50%, and the
regional nodes in 40% to 50% of patients. Intergroup Trial 0116 (INT
0116), a phase III trial, has recently demonstrated that adjuvant
radiation therapy with concurrent and maintenance 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)
and leucovorin (LV) reduces local failure and improves survival.
Adjuvant therapy is now routinely administered to patients undergoing
resection of gastric cancer for high-risk disease. Ongoing trials are
now investigating new systemic agents with radiation therapy to
establish efficacy compared to 5-FU and LV, as well as evaluating
neoadjuvant approaches prior to resection. Copyright 2002, Elsevier
Science (USA). All rights reserved.
15
UI - 11979419
AU - Meyerhardt JA; Fuchs CS
TI -
Chemotherapy options for gastric cancer.
SO - Semin Radiat Oncol 2002 Apr;12(2):176-86
AD - Department of Adult Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
02115, USA.
Most patients diagnosed with gastric cancer in the United States and the
Western World will either present with advanced disease or have
recurrence after surgery, requiring discussions of chemotherapy. The
evolution of chemotherapy for gastric cancer has been mixed with
excitement and disappointment. Multiple single-agent chemotherapies have
been shown to be only modestly effective in advanced disease, and the
search for the best combination of therapy has been difficult.
Contemporary combination therapies for advanced gastric cancer, usually
containing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and/or cisplatin, demonstrate response
rates in the 20% to 40% range, with median survivals between 6 and 12
months. While newer, standard chemotherapeutics, including the taxanes
and irinotecan, may offer modest additional benefits, each requires
further examination in phase III trials. Among patients with curatively
resected disease, postoperative chemoradiotherapy appears to improve
overall survival significantly. As a greater understanding of the
molecular basis of gastric cancer is gained, the inclusion of
biologic-based therapies will hopefully advance our ability to treat
patients with gastric cancer more effectively. Copyright 2002, Elsevier
Science (USA). All rights reserved.
16
UI - 11979420
AU - Tepper JE; Gunderson LL
TI -
Radiation treatment parameters in the adjuvant postoperative therapy of
gastric cancer.
SO - Semin Radiat Oncol 2002 Apr;12(2):187-95
AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of
Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. tepper@radonc.unc.edu
Radiation therapy will be used much more commonly in the treatment of
adenocarcinoma of the stomach because of the results of the Intergroup
Trial demonstrating an advantage to adjuvant postoperative
chemoradiation therapy. Previous descriptions of radiation fields have
not emphasized the variation in local spread patterns between tumors
located in different portions of the stomach and the varying extent of
the primary tumor and lymph node spread. Based on data obtained from
surgical and pathologic series, we have recommended a variation in the
radiation fields from those routinely applied at the present time.
Tumors located primarily in the region of the gastric cardia have the
highest risk of nodal involvement in the pericardial region and along
the lesser and greater curvature, as well as risk of spread into the
periesophageal tissue. However, there is a lower risk of involvement in
the distally located nodes, especially in the gastric antrum,
periduodenal, and porta hepatis regions. For a patient who has been well
evaluated both surgically and pathologically, and found to be node
negative, it may not be necessary to treat the nodes in these lower risk
sites. Similarly, tumors that originate in the distal stomach, in the
region of the gastric antrum, have a high likelihood of spread to the
periduodenal, peripancreatic, and porta hepatis nodes, and a lower
likelihood of spread to the nodes near the cardia of the stomach, the
periesophageal and mediastinal nodes, or to the splenic hilar nodes. Any
tumor originating in the stomach has a high propensity of spread to
nodes along the greater and lesser curvature, although they are most
likely to spread to those sites in close anatomic proximity to the
primary tumor mass. Based on such information, we have described the
nodal and primary sites that should be treated for different T- and
N-stage tumors located in the cardia, body, or antrum of the stomach.
These should be used as guides for defining appropriate field
arrangements for the adjuvant postoperative therapy of gastric cancer.
Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
17
UI - 12049068
AU - Allum WH; Griffin SM; Watson A; Colin-Jones D; Association of Upper
TI -
Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; British Society
of Gastroenterology; British Association of Surgical Oncology
Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.
SO - Gut 2002 Jun;50 Suppl 5():v1-23
AD - Department of Surgery, Epsom Hospital, Epsom, Surrey KT1 7EG, United
Kingdom
18
UI - 12046427
AU - Malatinec J; Bruncak P; Pelc J; Kovacs V; Cseri J
TI -
[Results of surgical treatment of gastric cancer]
SO - Rozhl Chir 2002 May;81(5):240-3
AD - Chirurgicke oddelenie, NsP Lucenec, Slovenska republika.
The authors retrospectively analyse a group (1991-2000) of 129 patients
with malignancies of the stomach operated at the Surgical Department of
The District Hospital in Lucenec. The operated patients were: males 83
(64%), females 46 (36%), mean age--63.4 years. Elective operations were
performed in 78.2% and acute operations in 21.8%. We were able to make
resections in 90 (69.8%) patients and palliative operations in 39
(30.2%) patients. On the basis of histologic
examinations-adenocarcinomas dominated (120 patients--93%). The
postoperative mortality was 4.65% and five-year survival 12%.
19
UI - 11557900
AU - Segol P
TI -
[Total esophagogastrectomy via left throacophrenic access for cancer of
the cardia]
SO - J Chir (Paris) 2001 Aug;138(4):217-21
AD - Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Caen Cote de Nacre, Caen, France.
20
UI - 11682961
AU - Adani GL; Marcello D; Mazzetti J; Maestroni U; Anania G; Donini A
TI -
[Role of surgery in the treatment of primary gastric lymphoma and
assessment of new therapeutic approaches]
SO - G Chir 2001 Aug-Sep;22(8-9):273-6
AD - Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Anestesiologiche e Radiologiche
Sezione di Clinica Chirurgica, Universita degli Studi di Ferrara.
Controversy remains regarding the best treatment for primary gastric
lymphoma (PGL). Recent developments in diagnosis and chemotherapy have
changed strategies for this disease. Fourteen patients with primary
gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma underwent surgery. Before surgery 9/14
patients underwent Helicobacter pylori eradication, and 4/14 were
treated with chemotherapy. In two patients chemotherapy was not possible
because of risk of perforation recurred. Total gastrectomy with N2
lymphadenectomy, splenectomy, biopsy of mesenteric lymph nodes, and
hepatic biopsy were done. Then patients underwent post-operative
chemotherapy. Involved-field radiation therapy was made in four
patients. The overall survival was 64.2 percent. Surgery was the
treatment of choice in cases of gastric lymphoma non-responsive to
medical therapy and to control complications or when gastroscopy did not
supply correct diagnosis.
21
UI - 11992807
AU - Newman E; Marcus SG; Potmesil M; Sewak S; Yee H; Sorich J; Hayek M;
TI -
Muggia F; Hochster H
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CPT-11 and cisplatin downstages locally
advanced gastric cancer.
SO - J Gastrointest Surg 2002 Mar-Apr;6(2):212-23; discussion 223
AD - Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York,
New York 10016, USA. elliot.newman@med.nyu.edu
We examined the role of neoadjuvant therapy in downstaging locally
advanced gastric cancer. Preoperative staging was performed with a
combination of CT scans, endoscopic ultrasonography and/or laparoscopy,
and laparoscopic ultrasonography. Patients with T > or =3 tumors and/or
node-positive disease by preoperative clinical staging were eligible for
entry. Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of two cycles of CPT-11 (75
mg/m(2)) with cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)) weekly four times every 6 weeks.
This was followed by resection with D2 lymph node dissection and two
cycles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with floxuridine and cisplatin.
Twenty-two patients were entered into the study (4 with T3N0 disease and
18 with T3N1 disease). Induction chemotherapy was well tolerated with
major toxicities being neutropenia and diarrhea. A median of 78%/75% of
the planned dosage of CPT-11/cisplatin was delivered. Two patients
withdrew consent during the first cycle and were lost to follow-up. One
patient progressed to stage IV disease during induction chemotherapy and
did not undergo surgery. Nineteen patients underwent surgery. One
patient had undetected stage IV disease (liver) and underwent a
palliative R2 resection. Of the 18 remaining patients, 17 had curative
R0 resections and one had a palliative R1 resection. A median of 21
lymph nodes (range 1 to 121) were examined histologically. There was one
postoperative death. Surgical morbidity did not appear to increase after
the neoadjuvant regimen. The median postoperative length of hospital
stay was 9 days (range 3 to 75 days). Postoperative pathologic staging
yielded 16% T3 lesions compared to 85% before treatment based on
clinical staging; postoperative American Joint Committee on Cancer
staging yielded 37% stage IIIA disease compared to 70% stage IIIA before
treatment. With a median follow-up of 15 months, median survival has not
yet been reached. We conclude that CPT-11-based neoadjuvant therapy
downstages locally advanced gastric cancer. Further follow-up is
necessary to determine the ultimate impact of this combination therapy
on recurrence and survival.
22
UI - 12017304
AU - Kim R; Yoshida K; Toge T
TI -
Current status and future perspectives of post-operative adjuvant
therapy for gastric carcinoma.
SO - Anticancer Res 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1A):283-9
AD - Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation
Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Japan.
rkim@ipc.hiroshima-u.ac.jp
The clinical benefit of post-operative adjuvant immunochemotherapy for
survival of patients with gastric carcinoma is unclear, although a
number of prospective randomized controlled studies have been conducted.
The current status and future perspectives of post-operative adjuvant
chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma have been evaluated in terms of
survival benefit. The results of randomized clinical studies vary in
accordance with the regimen and sample size. A meta-analysis, however,
indicated a survival benefit in patients treated with post-operative
adjuvant chemotherapy including mitomycin, anthracyclines,
cyclophosphamide, alkylating agents and 5-fluorouracil (odds ratio: 0.8
to approximately 0.82, 95% CI<1.0). The survival benefit was observed in
patients with stage II and stage III gastric carcinoma, but not those
with stage I. Further, the survival benefit in node-positive and high
histological grade subgroups was superior to that in node-negative and
low histological grade subgroups. Although combination therapy with
mitomycin, 5-fluorouracil and non-specific immunomodulators, such as PSK
and OK-432, appeared to improve overall survival without
immunomodulators, the survival effect of immunomodulators is still not
clear. There are several possible reasons why the survival benefit of
adjuvant chemotherapy or immunochemotherapy is small and marginal
compared to surgery alone: (i) low efficacy of the chemotherapy regimen;
(ii) small sample size; and (iii) differences in chemosensitivity of
treated patients based on genetic background. The determination of
subgroups responsive to chemotherapy and the development of a
rationale-based and molecular-targeted chemotherapy are required to
clearly demonstrate whether there is a survival benefit of
post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma.
23
UI - 12017305
AU - Inada T; Ogata Y; Kubota T; Ishihara M; Tomikawa M; Ando J; Ozawa I;
TI -
Hishinuma S; Shimizu H; Kotake K
D2-lymphadenectomy improves the survival of patients with peritoneal
cytology-positive gastric cancer.
SO - Anticancer Res 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1A):291-4
AD - Department of Surgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan.
tinada@tcc.pref.tochigi.jp
BACKGROUND: According to the current Japanese Classification of Gastric
Cancer, patients with peritoneal cytology-positive (CY1) gastric cancer
are classified as stage IV and the curative potential of resection for
these patients is regarded as non-curative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We
compared the clinical outcome of CY1 patients (n=55) with those of
patients with other non-curative factors (n=87), to clarify the optimal
surgical strategy for CY1 patients. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate of
CY1 patients was 10.8%, which was significantly better than that
observed in the patients with the other non-curative factors. Among CY1
cases, survival outcome of the patients with lymph node metastasis
limited to within group 2 was significantly better than the patients
with group 3 lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSION: These results suggested
that gastrectomy combined with extended lymphadenectomy should be
recommended for patients with gastric cancer who have positive
peritoneal cytology as the only non-curative factor.
24
UI - 11813582
AU - Nakamura H; Yanai H; Nishikawa J; Okamoto T; Hirano A; Higaki M; Omori
TI -
K; Yoshida T; Okita K
Experience with photodynamic therapy (endoscopic laser therapy) for the
treatment of early gastric cancer.
SO - Hepatogastroenterology 2001 Nov-Dec;48(42):1599-603
AD - First Department of Internal Medicine, Yamaguchi University School of
Medicine, 1-1-1 Minamikogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Photodynamic therapy has been developed as an
endoscopic laser therapy for gastrointestinal malignant tumors. The
targets for curative upper gastrointestinal endoscopic therapy are
carcinomas that are considered statistically unlikely to be accompanied
with metastases to the lymph nodes. Endoscopic mucosal resection is the
therapy of first choice for such carcinomas. In the application of
photodynamic therapy, we narrow down its practical indications to
patients who are not indicated for curative endoscopic treatment by
preoperative examination or those with histologic findings of endoscopic
mucosal resection specimens who reject surgical treatment or are at high
risk in surgical treatment. METHODOLOGY: The effect of photodynamic
therapy using Porfimer sodium and an Excimer dye laser was evaluated
endoscopically in 8 lesions of 7 patients with early gastric cancer.
RESULTS: Complete responses were obtained in all patients. As side
effects, mild photosensitivity was seen in 6 patients and lasted for
several months. CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy was safety employed,
with success in 7 patients with early gastric cancer. We conclude that
photodynamic therapy can be a useful palliative method with high tumor
selectivity in the treatment of early gastric cancer.
25
UI - 11813627
AU - Ichikawa D; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T;
TI -
Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Oka T; Kurioka H
Esophagogastrostomy reconstruction after limited proximal gastrectomy.
SO - Hepatogastroenterology 2001 Nov-Dec;48(42):1797-801
AD - Department of Surgery, Kyoto First Red Cross Hospital, 15-749 Honmachi,
Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan. dichykawa@nifty.com
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent advances in diagnostic techniques have led to
the detection of an increasing number of early gastric cancers in the
upper third of the stomach. The objective of this study was to determine
the most appropriate surgical treatment for these cancers. METHODOLOGY:
The clinicopathologic characteristics of 35 patients with early gastric
cancer in the upper third of the stomach who underwent three different
types of gastrectomies were reviewed retrospectively from hospital
undergoing limited proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy
reconstruction had shorter operation times and less blood loss than
those for patients undergoing total gastrectomy or proximal gastrectomy
with jejunal interposition. No lymph node metastasis was identified in
any of these patients. Heartburn due to reflux esophagitis was seen in a
few patients of each group, but they were successfully treated by
antacids. The extreme reduction in food intake volume was more
frequently experienced in patients with total gastrectomy than those
with both proximal gastrectomies. When mortality due to other disease
was excluded, all patients survived without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: A
limited proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy reconstruction
decreased surgical risk and realized preservation of maximal function.
26
UI - 11813628
AU - Lee JH; Noh SH; Lah KH; Choi SH; Min JS
TI -
The prognosis of stage IV gastric carcinoma patients after curative
resection.
SO - Hepatogastroenterology 2001 Nov-Dec;48(42):1802-5
AD - Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, C.P.O. Box
8044, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seadaemun-ku, 120-752, Seoul, Korea.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In the UICC staging system, stage IV contains not only
those patients with distant metastasis but also patients with
far-advanced T and N status but without distant metastasis. We
investigated the prognostic factors of stage IV gastric carcinoma
patients, without distant metastasis after curative resection and the
role of surgery. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and ninety stage IV gastric
carcinoma patients, without distant metastasis were reviewed after
RESULTS: Male sex, distal third location, diffuse or infiltrative type
and histologically undifferentiated type were common. Of the 190
patients, 52 (27.4%) patients lived more than 3 years. The lymph node
ratio (positive lymph node/retrieved lymph node) and combined resection
independently affected survival (P = 0.0013, 0.0061, respectively). The
perigastric lymph node ratio was well correlated with overall lymph node
ratio (r = 0.794, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With the involvement of an
adjacent organ and knowing the perigastric lymph node ratio, the surgeon
can decide upon the extent of dissection and postoperative treatment.
However, a prospective study is warranted.
27
UI - 11460069
AU - Franciosi CM; Angelini C; Mussi C; Sartori P; Romano F; De Fina S;
TI -
Uggeri F
[Stomach lymphoma]
SO - Minerva Chir 2001 Aug;56(4):337-43
AD - Divisione di Clinica Chirurgica Generale I, Ospedale San Gerardo, II
Universita di Milano, Bicocca, Monza, Milan, Italy.
BACKGROUND: Primitive gastric lymphoma (PGL) is a rare tumour, and
although its incidence is rising it is difficult to state the role of
the various therapeutic methods in treating this disease. Aim of this
study is to point out what sequence of treatment is more effective
trying to find out some guidelines which can be useful in clinical
practice. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical data of 54
patients with PGL admitted at a University surgical department during 10
years. All the patients underwent neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy
and D2 gastrectomy. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 120 months. Survival was
related to: Mushoff's stage of disease, the grade according to the
Working Formulation and the sequence of treatment. Statistical analysis
was performed by Kaplan-Maier method and the difference between survival
curves was compared by log-rank test. RESULTS: Mean postoperative
hospital stay was 12 days and morbidity was 18%. Five and 10 years
overall survival rates were 70 and 85%. There was a significant
difference in survival between patients with high grade PGL and those
with intermediate grade (p=0.0188) as well as in those with low grade
(p=0.0435). Patients in stages IE-II1E had a significantly longer
survival than those in stages IIIE-IVE (p=0.0123). Patients in stages
IE-II1E underwent neadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery and survived
longer than those in whom surgery preceded chemotherapy (p=0.0293)
instead for patients in stages IIIE-IVE neoadjuvant chemotherapy
shortened survival (p=0.0403). CONCLUSIONS: In personal opinion, in
patients in stages IE-II1E chemotherapy should be carried out before
surgery, while in those in stages IIIE-IVE the reverse scheme is more
effective in achieving longer survival rates.
28
UI - 11933115
AU - Melchart D; Clemm C; Weber B; Draczynski T; Worku F; Linde K;
TI -
Weidenhammer W; Wagner H; Saller R
Polysaccharides isolated from Echinacea purpurea herba cell cultures to
counteract undesired effects of chemotherapy--a pilot study.
SO - Phytother Res 2002 Mar;16(2):138-42
AD - Centre for Complementary Medicine Research, Department of Internal
Medicine II, Technische Universitat, Kaiserstrasse 9, 80801 Munich,
Germany. Dieter.Melchart@lrz.tu-muenchen.de
In an open prospective study with matched historical controls we aimed
to evaluate whether a polysaccharide fraction isolated from the herb
Echinacea purpurea could counteract the undesired effects of
chemotherapy. Fifteen patients with advanced gastric cancer undergoing
palliative chemotherapy with etoposide, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil
(ELF) received for 10 days (beginning 3 days before chemotherapy) daily
i.v. injections of 2 mg of a polysaccharide fraction isolated from
Echinacea purpurea herb cell cultures (EPS-EPO VIIa). The median number
of leukocytes 14-16 days after chemotherapy was 3630/microL (range
1470-5770) in the patients receiving EPS-EPO VIIa compared with
2370/microL (870-3950) in the patients of the historical control group
(p = 0.015). EPS-EPO VIIa had no clinically relevant effects on
phagocytic activity of granulocytes or on lymphocyte subpopulations.
Sixty-eight adverse events including two deaths were observed, most
likely due to chemotherapy and the general condition of the patients.
However, an association with the test intervention cannot be ruled out
completely. The results of this pilot study suggest that EPS-EPO VIIa
might be effective in reducing chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. The
efficacy and safety should be investigated in further studies. Copyright
2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
29
UI - 11976838
AU - Liu JM; Chen LT; Chao Y; Li AF; Wu CW; Liu TS; Shiah HS; Chang JY; Chen
TI -
JD; Wu HW; Lin WC; Lan C; Whang-Peng J
Phase II and pharmacokinetic study of GL331 in previously treated
Chinese gastric cancer patients.
SO - Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2002 May;49(5):425-8
AD - Division of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes,
Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, Shipai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
PURPOSE: A phase II and pharmacokinetic study was designed to assess the
efficacy and toxicity profile of an epidophyllotoxin analogue, GL331, in
previously treated Chinese gastric cancer patients, with concurrent
pharmacokinetic evaluation of the drug's metabolism. MATERIAL AND
METHODS: GL331 was given at 200 mg/m(2) as a daily 3-h infusion for 5
days every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Enrolled in the study were 15 patients. One
patient died from neutropenic sepsis before evaluation, one patient did
not receive the full dose for reasons unrelated to GL331, nine patients
had progressive disease with a median survival of 80 days, and five had
stable disease with a median survival of 240 days. Grade 3 and 4
myelosuppression occurred in 10 of the 15 patients, with one death from
neutropenic sepsis. This patient's peak GL331 concentration was 16.8
microg/ml, which was high compared to the mean peak drug concentration
of 6+/-4.1 microg/ml. The mean systemic GL331 clearance was 12.1+/-7.2
l/h per m(2), much lower than 23.3+/-8.2 l/h per m(2) found in the phase
I trial. Topoisomerase IIalpha was determined by immunohistochemistry
and overexpression was detected in 3 of 11 specimens. CONCLUSIONS: GL331
was ineffective at this dose and schedule in this group of patients in
spite of adequate blood levels of the drug.
30
UI - 12056462
AU - Yokota T; Saito T; Teshima S; Yamada Y; Iwamoto K; Takahashi M; Kunii Y;
TI -
Murata K; Ishiyama S; Yamauchi H
Probability of lymph node metastasis in small gastric cancer tumor: is
it an indication for limited surgery?
SO - Int Surg 2001 Oct-Dec;86(4):206-9
AD - Department of Surgery, Sendai National Hospital, Japan.
yokota-t@snh.go.jp
The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that are
predictive of lymph node metastasis in a small gastric cancer tumor <2
cm in diameter. The clinicopathological features of 17 patients with
node-positive small gastric cancer were reviewed from the database of
gastric cancer at the Department of Surgery, Sendai National Hospital,
Sendai, Japan, and they were compared with those of 131 patients with
node-negative cancer. The independent risk factors influencing the lymph
node metastasis were determined by multiple logistic regression
analysis. Depth of invasion, macroscopic appearance, cancer-stromal
relationship, and lymphatic microinvasion were found to be associated
with lymph node metastasis. The variables found to be significant risk
factors for lymph node metastasis were depth of invasion (P = 0.0250)
and lymphatic microinvasion (P = 0.0028). It is possible for even a
small gastric cancer tumor to have lymph node metastasis. A surgeon
treating a small gastric cancer tumor must consider that although the
cure rate is high, >10% of these tumors have lymph node metastases.
Because of the possibility of lymph node metastasis, even with accurate
knowledge of the depth of cancer invasion, selective performance of
local resection or limited surgery with incomplete lymph node dissection
is not justified. Accurate preoperative diagnosis and the appropriate
decision for surgical indication are important. Large-scale randomized,
controlled trials should be performed to show the advantage of limited
surgery for gastric cancer.
The above citations and abstracts reflect those newly added to CANCERLIT for the month and topic listed in the title. The citations have been retrieved from CANCERLIT using a predefined search strategy of indexed subject terms. Although the search strategy has been refined as best as possible, citations may appear that are not directly related to the topic, and occasionally relevant references may be omitted.
Dr. Giantonio discusses the privileges bestowed on physicians in our society and the dangers of this. Read more.
Cancer Types
Bone Cancer
Brain Tumors
Breast Cancer
Carcinoid Tumors
Endocrine System Cancers
Gastrointestinal Cancers
Gynecologic Cancers
Head and Neck Cancers
Leukemia
Lung Cancers
Lymphomas
Myelomas
Pediatric Cancers
Penile Cancer
Prostate Cancer
Sarcomas
Skin Cancers
Testicular Cancer
Thyroid Cancer
Urinary Tract Cancers
OncoLink Vet
Cancer Treatment
Biologic Therapy
Bone Marrow Transplants
Chemotherapy
Clinical Trials
Complementary Medicine
Gene Therapy
General Treatment Concerns
Hormone Therapy
PDT Center
Proton Therapy
Radiation Oncology
Surgical Oncology
Targeted Therapies
Vaccine Therapies
Cancer Support
Caregivers
Hospice Care and Bereavement
Nutrition and Cancer
Sexuality & Fertility
Side Effects
Support
Survivorship
Exercise and Cancer
Cancer Resources
Cancer News
OncoLink University
Nurses' Notes
Conferences
Newly Diagnosed Patients
Causes and Prevention
Legal and Financial Information for Patients
LGBT Resources
NCI Resources
Global Resources
Cancer Resource List
Resources for Young Adults
OncoLink Media Library
OncoLink TV
Book, Music and Video Reviews
Ask the Experts
Brown Bag Chat
Tracy's Corner
About OncoLink
About OncoLink
Giving to OncoLink
Contact Information
Usage Policy
Editorial Board
How to Partner with OncoLink
Link to OncoLink
Mission Statement
Calcium Leucovorin, Citrovorum Factor, Folinic Acid
Cladribine (2-CDA, Leustatin®)
Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan®, Neosar®, Endoxan®)
Cyclosporine (Neoral®, Sandimmune®, Restasis®, Gengraf®)
Cytarabine (Cytosar-U®, Ara-C)
Irinotecan (Camptosar®, CPT-11)
Leucovorin (Calcium Leucovorin, Citrovorum Factor, Folinic Acid)
Calcium Leucovorin, Citrovorum Factor, Folinic Acid
Leucovorin (Calcium Leucovorin, Citrovorum Factor, Folinic Acid)
Leuprolide Acetate (Lupron®, Lupron Depot®, Eligard®, Prostap®, Viadur®) - For Men
Leuprolide Acetate (Lupron®, Lupron Depot®, Eligard®, Prostap®, Viadur®) - For Women
Lupron®, Lupron Depot®, Eligard®, Prostap®, Viadur®
Lupron®, Lupron Depot®, Eligard®, Prostap®, Viadur®
Busulfan (Myleran®, Busulfex®)
Intravesicular Mitomycin (Mutamycin®, Mitomycin-C, given into the bladder)
Mechlorethamine (Mustargen®, Nitrogen Mustard)
mechlorethamine, mustine, Mustargen®
Megestrol (Megace®, Megace-ES®)
Mercaptopurine (Purinethol®, 6-MP)
Methotrexate (Mexate®, Folex®, Rheumatrex®, Amethopterin, MTX)
Mexate®, Folex®, Rheumatrex®, Amethopterin, MTX
Mitomycin (Mutamycin®, Mitomycin-C)
Morphine Sulfate (Given by IV)
Morphine Sulfate (MS Contin®, Avinza®, Kadian®, Oramorph SR®)
MS Contin®, Avinza®, Kadian®, Oramorph SR®
Mutamycin®, Mitomycin-C, given into the bladder
Nitrogen mustard (mechlorethamine, mustine, Mustargen®)
Bendamustine Hydrochloride (Treanda®)
Bexarotene (Targretin®), Oral Formulation
Bexarotene Gel (Targretin® Gel Formulation)
Etoposide (Toposar®, VePesid®, Etopophos®,VP-16)
Thioguanine (6-TG, Thioguanine Tabloid®)
Toposar®, VePesid®, Etopophos®,VP-16
Trelstar LA® and Trelstar Depot®
Tretinoin (Vesanoid®, All-Trans-Retinoic Acid, ATRA)
Triptorelin (Trelstar LA® and Trelstar Depot®)

