Temporary seed implants versus permanent seed implants for prostate cancer

Richard Whittington, MD
Ultima Vez Modificado: 15 de septiembre del 2002

Share article


Imprima English

Question

Dear OncoLink "Ask The Experts,"

Do you know of any stats that show the relative effectiveness of high dose radiation (HDR) temporary seed implants versus the more traditional permanent seed implants? Is there any advantage that you know of in the HDR method?

 

Answer

Richard Whittington, MD, Associate Professor of Radiation Oncology at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, responds:

The low dose rate is more effective against less aggressive tumors, and some think the high dose rate may be more effective against more aggressive tumors, although these tumors are more likely to spread and are usually treated with hormones as well as radiation. There is a real question whether high dose conventional external beam radiation with hormones is more or less effective or safer than high dose rate brachytherapy with hormones.

Very few centers do the high dose rate and they do it primarily for high-risk prostate cancer. Low dose rate (I-125 or Pd-103) is usually reserved for low risk cancers. The groups at the University of Wisconsin, Virginia Mason Hospital, and William Beaumont Hospital have reported their results with high dose rate therapy and it looks good in high-risk patients for local control, although these patients are also more likely to have trouble with distant metastases, and this risk is not affected.

Imprima English

I Wish You Knew

Understanding prostate cancer screening

View More



Blogs and Web Chats

OncoLink Blogs give our readers a chance to react to and comment on key cancer news topics and provides a forum for OncoLink Experts and readers to share opinions and learn from each other.




OncoLink OncoPilot

Frente a un nuevo diagnóstico de cáncer o de cambiar el curso de su tratamiento actual? Deje que nuestro personal de enfermería cáncer que ayudan a pasar!

Más información