OncoLink Cancer Treatment and Resources
Link to OncoLink

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary high grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma: A matched case control study

Reviewer: Neha Vapiwala, MD
OncoLink
Ultima Vez Modificado: 1 de junio del 2003

Presenter: S. R. Grobmyer
Presenter's Affiliation: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Type of Session: Scientific

Background

    The investigation of high grade (HG) extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is often challenging secondary to the relative rarity of these tumors. Furthermore, acquiring broad treatment data is difficult given the substantial heterogeneity of tumor subtypes. A meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled high-risk sarcoma trials demonstrated a statitically significant improvement in recurrence-free survival with the use of preoperative doxorubicin-based chemotherapy compared to control pts undergoing surgery and postoperative radiation therapy when indicated. No overall survival difference was seen in the whole group, although subgroup analysis of extremity lesions did demonstrate a 10-yr survival advantage of ~7%. Three small prospective randomized trials evaluated doxorubicin/ifosfamide therapy in primary STS, although only one of these showed a survival difference with adjuvant combination chemotherapy. The goal of this study was to characterize survival predictors in patients with large, HG STS as well as the association of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with survival and recurrence.

Materials and Methods

  • Case-control study using pts with HG STS of size > 5 cm identified from MSKCC and Dana-Farber databases from 1978 to 2001
  • Control pts (n=411) = no chemotherapy but were treated with surgery and, in most cases, postoperative radiation
  • Case pts (n=76) = neoadjuvant AIM chemotherapy (adriamycin/ifosfamide/mesna) prior to surgery
  • Median follow-up for controls = 50 mos
  • Median follow-up for cases = 38 mos
  • First, multivariate analysis performed to determine factors associated with disease specific survival in control group
  • These factors were then used to match controls to treated cases
  • After matching, controls and cases were randomly grouped in a 5:1 ratio when possible
  • Sarcoma-specific, local relapse-free and distant relapse-free survivals were evaluated

Results

  • No significant difference in 4-yr sarcoma- specific survival between two groups
  • However, 2-yr sarcoma-specific survival showed benefit of 11% in chemotherapy group
  • No significant difference in local and distant relapse-free survivals
  • Four factors found to be significant survival predictors on multivariate analysis: 1) age > 60 yrs old 2) histologic subtype 3) size > 10 cm 4) positive margins
  • No significant difference in disease-specific survival between histologic subtypes in the chemotherapy group
  • Leiomyosarcoma and malignant peripheral nerve sheath subtypes associated with decreased survival in multivariate analysis of control group

Author's Conclusions

  • Size of primary lesion, histologic subtype, age of pt, and positive margins all factors significantly associated with disease specific survival
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with AIM gives a 2-yr sarcoma-specific survival benefit.
  • This benefit is not seen on longer follow-up.
  • 2-yr and 4-yr distant recurrence-free survival rates did not differ between the case and control arms.

Clinical/Scientific Implications

    Established predictors of survival in large, high-grade sarcomas include patient age, histologic subtype, tumor size and margin status. The addition of neoadjuvant doxorubicin-based combination chemotherapy to the treatment algorithm of pts with high risk soft tissue sarcomas appears to have a short-term benefit in sarcoma-specific survival. However, 4-yr data do not show a continued benefit to adding chemotherapy, as compared to control pts treated with surgery +/- postoperative radiation only. In light of this observation, the authors suggest that new neoadjuvant regimens might be developed for future trials to better delineate the role of chemotherapy in optimizing outcome for high risk patients. Currently there is no role for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of STS outside of a clinical trial.

Oncolink's ASCO Coverage made possible by an unrestricted Educational Grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology.

OncoLink I wish u knew...

Dr. Mao discusses why a patient’s culture plays an important role in treatment decisions. Read more.

Cancer Types
Bone Cancer
Brain Tumors
Breast Cancer
Carcinoid Tumors
Endocrine System Cancers
Gastrointestinal Cancers
Gynecologic Cancers
Head and Neck Cancers
Leukemia
Lung Cancers
Lymphomas
Myelomas
Pediatric Cancers
Penile Cancer
Prostate Cancer
Sarcomas
Skin Cancers
Testicular Cancer
Thyroid Cancer
Urinary Tract Cancers
OncoLink Vet

Cancer Treatment
Biologic Therapy
Bone Marrow Transplants
Chemotherapy

Clinical Trials
Complementary Medicine
Gene Therapy
General Treatment Concerns
Hormone Therapy
PDT Center
Proton Therapy
Radiation Oncology
Surgical Oncology
Targeted Therapies
Vaccine Therapies

Cancer Support
Caregivers
Hospice Care and Bereavement
Nutrition and Cancer
Sexuality & Fertility
Side Effects
Support
Survivorship
Exercise and Cancer

Cancer Resources
Cancer News
OncoLink University
Nurses' Notes
Conferences
Newly Diagnosed Patients
Causes and Prevention
Legal and Financial Information for Patients
LGBT Resources
NCI Resources
Global Resources
Cancer Resource List
Resources for Young Adults

OncoLink Media Library
OncoLink TV
Book, Music and Video Reviews


Ask the Experts
Brown Bag Chat
Tracy's Corner

About OncoLink
About OncoLink
Giving to OncoLink
Contact Information
Usage Policy
Editorial Board
How to Partner with OncoLink
Link to OncoLink
Mission Statement

OncoLink Cancer Resources RSS What's New RSS